First my apologies for not showing up here over the last few days. I was working the phone here for the Trump campaign calling “non affiliated” registered voters. Also I have been real active over at Gold is Money 2 forum, a place I have posted too since 2006. A few of us there stayed up all night posting results as they came in. Yeah it was good. Now I want to share this poem from Sundance over at The Last Refuge Blog. Hope y’all enjoy.
Today seems like a good day to repost this. At the end I’ll let you in on a little open secret.
Listen my children and you shall hear
Of the consequence of a plan held dear.
Through the days of October, in Twenty-Sixteen;
Hardly a man remains to be seen
Who remembers those famous days that year.
One man gave voice to corruptions’ removal
With steadfast admonishment despite their refusal;
Held the Q-beam aloft and lighted their ruse
A billionaire walked in the average mans shoes.
Elitists decried the demands to step down
As the rallies continued in village and town;
Admonished and more they were labeled deplorable
Yet the strong brilliant faces were simply adorable.
Continue reading “Our Victory”
Martin Armstrong addresses this complex question..
QUESTION: Marty; You are very good at constitutional law. What is your take if Hillary is indicted? Will she be impeached?
ANSWER: A President cannot be impeached for crimes prior to taking office. Only those committed during their office. If Congress called her back as President for an investigation and she lied under oath, that would be impeachable. Nevertheless, this question would invoke Section 3 of the 20th Amendment. There is no Supreme Court interpretation of that Amendment and it would turn on the meaning of does she “qualify”to take office. This is what Section 3 says:
Continue reading “What Happens if Hillary is Indicted? Will She Be Impeached?”
I have been preaching this for almost 30 years now. It just falls on deaf ears.
[Editor’s note: AGAIN, please read with discernment.] An extraordinary Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today says this morning President Putin was “officially presented” with a Main Directorate for Migration Affairs (GUVM) of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MVD) “file for review” relating to a request for “urgent and immediate” political asylum requested by an American citizen named Eric Braverman—who was the former CEO of the Clinton Foundation, and is known as the man who can expose “The Real Hillary Clinton Scandal”.
from What Does It Mean:
Requests for the granting of political asylum in the Federation, this report explains, is regulated by a separate government resolution rather than the Law on Refugees and is issued to those seeking “asylum or protection from persecution or a real threat of becoming a victim of persecution” in their home country for “social-political activities or convictions that do not contradict the democratic principles recognized by the international community and norms of international law”—and though Russia has the world’s highest number of asylum applications, political asylum requests are very rarely granted.
Continue reading “Kremlin In Turmoil After Clinton Foundation CEO Requests “Urgent And Immediate” Asylum”
Recall that in a March 2015 interview with CBS, just after the NYT reported of Hillary’s use of a private email server, president Obama told the American public he had only learned about Hillary’s “unusual” arrangement from the press.
As we further reminded readers one month ago, CBS News senior White House correspondent Bill Plante asked Mr. Obama when he learned about her private email system after his Saturday appearance in Selma, Alabama. “The same time everybody else learned it through news reports,” the president told Plante. “The policy of my administration is to encourage transparency, which is why my emails, the BlackBerry I carry around, all those records are available and archived,” Mr. Obama said. “I’m glad that Hillary’s instructed that those emails about official business need to be disclosed.”
Unfortunately, the “transparency” of the Obama administration was severely tarnished in late September, when in the FBI’s interview notes with Huma Abedin released by the FBI it was first revealed that Obama had used a pseudonymous email account: “Once informed that the sender’s name is believed to be pseudonym used by the president, Abedin exclaimed: ‘How is this not classified?'” the report says. “Abedin then expressed her amazement at the president’s use of a pseudonym and asked if she could have a copy of the email.”
Continue reading “The Smoking Gun: Cheryl Mills Tells Podesta “We Need To Clean This Up – Obama Has Emails From Her””